|
Colorado Information Management Association/
Fall Educational Seminar - Nov. 29 - Dec.
1, 2006
IT Diversity: Juggling Many Hats
|
Realizing Organizational
Change in State Government - Thur. 11/30/2006
|
|
Presenter: Michelle Pedersen
|
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please
select one):
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Excellent |
10
|
66.7%
|
| Good |
5
|
33.3%
|
| Fair |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Poor |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
14
|
93.3%
|
| No |
1
|
6.7%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized
& prepared?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
15
|
100.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s)
knowledgeable about materials?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
15
|
100.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation
style effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
14
|
93.3%
|
| No |
1
|
6.7%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were course objectives met?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
14
|
93.3%
|
| No |
1
|
6.7%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids
effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
15
|
100.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
15
|
100%
|
|
|
Comments on strong points of
sessions | |
- good presenters!
- information applicable to current needs
- all- excellent (illegible)
- very thorough
- based on experience rather than theory.
- 3 speakers broke things up nicely. Good pace, kept things
moving, good subject matter from experts.
- The handout was very informative while using the power
point presentation.
- Great! Thanks Julie
- each presenter knew their part of the presentation.
- Very fact and fast paced. It kept my attention. Great
visual aids.
- Handed out presentation prior to session; Solid example;Good
content.
Not Answered: 4
|
Comments on the weak points of
sessions | |
- text on ppt studies too light
- n/a
- not long enough!
- itsy, bitsy, unreadable text on the pp slides and
handout.
- none
- Last half of the slide presentation was harder to
see. Larger print would've been welcomed.
- Way Fast!
- None
- Julie needs to slow down a bit.
- Spoke too fast, some slides were too small of print
Not Answered: 5
|
How could these sessions be improved?
| |
- 3 hour session
- More real world (actual) examples, in detail, in a longer
presentation.
- Larger print on handouts- double sided prints I would
like an all day on this!
- none
- This one might be good to have in 2-3 sessions, to go
over further.
Not Answered: 8
|
| |
|
