|
Colorado Fiscal Managers’ Association/Colorado Information Management Association/
Colorado State Managers’ Association
Spring Educational Seminar – May 17-19, 2006
Investing in Our Future:
People, Programs & Performance
|
Retention: For Generations to Come |
Presenter: Michelle Pedersen, Ken Doby |
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Excellent |
33 |
80.5% |
| Good |
8 |
19.5% |
| Fair |
0 |
0.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
41 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
40 |
97.6% |
| No |
1 |
2.4% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
41 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
41 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
40 |
97.6% |
| No |
1 |
2.4% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentagel |
| Yes |
41 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
41 |
100% |
|
|
Comments on strong points of sessions |
|
- very interactive presentation
- interactive, hands on good providers
- lots of energy
- enjoyed the variety, interaction (w.o too much interaction)
- generation at work retention startegy
- energy good information
- posters and visual aids
- action
- made it alot of fun
- very interactive, funny and entertaining
- excited about topic which kept topic fun
- hi-energy, focused
- content- usefullness, plan to share wtih other depts. really enjoyed the active parcipation in session. the presenter were very good, engaged used humer easy to relate to
- good speakers, good subject, kept everyone engaged
- flew by b/c of particpation events
- fun
- lots of group participation
- great and helpful info
- interactive - kept involved fun, both had energy
- exercises
- good visual and good examples and energy
- very engaging and entertaining, informative also
- enterating and good info
- very enjoyable
- was fun as well as informative
- lively, entertaining
- group work
- good info
- great overview
- brought up commen sense approaches
- good interaction, energetic
- understanding important characterists of diverse generations w/in workplace
- focus on connecting
- good energy from both. will use in workplace
- high energy
Not Answered: 6
|
Comments on the weak points of sessions |
|
- no q and a
- handout didnt match slide show
- over generalizing
- sound, could hear michelle at times
- would have liked to see overall statutes for the state, planned retention and state plans for dealy
- could have been longer
- have all conten included in handout, including 2 copies of pages that are used to write on, so they could be used again
- more time
- not all slides were in hand out
- some did not particpate
- uninformed about sections or govt worker
Not Answered: 30
|
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
- have time for q/a
- excellent
- little more in depth
- would like handout sent to
- more focus on types of management
Not Answered: 36
|
