Wireless 2.0: TCO,
Security & Migrating 802.11abg to
802.11n - Thur. - 10/02/2008
- Brett Schavey & Ric Lukasiewicz
Not Answered: 0
|
|
Question: |
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Excellent |
1 |
25.0% |
| Good |
1 |
25.0% |
| Fair |
2 |
50.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
Comments on the strong points of sessions: |
|
|
- Knowledgeable, articulate
- Lots of very good information. We talked about this session throughout the evening. Good one to repeat!
Not Answered: 2 |
Question: |
Comments on the weak points of sessions: |
|
|
- What changes were implemented to make wireless more secure than non-wireless
- Graphs & images are too small for room size
- Presenter spoke very monotone
Not Answered: 1 |
|
Question: |
Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
3 |
75.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
25.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
3 |
75.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
25.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
3 |
75.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
25.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
3 |
75.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
25.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
2 |
50.0% |
| No |
1 |
25.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
25.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
3 |
75.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
25.0% |
| Total |
4 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
|
- Less focus on the product sales pitch
Not Answered: 3 |
|
|