Winning the War on Terror -
Wed. 10/01/2008

Question: Presenter:

  • Joe Bierly

Not Answered: 0
Question:
Overall quality of the session (please select one):
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Excellent 21 80.8%
Good 5 19.2%
Fair 0 0.0%
Poor 0 0.0%
Not Answered 0 0.0%
Total 26 100%
 
Question:
Comments on the strong points of sessions:


  • Got called out of room, but what I saw was fascinating
  • The review of actual cases, Reference materials (i.e. books)
  • Reality check on status of war on terror
  • Sure opens your eyes to our world and the constant threat we are under. After this class I will sure be more aware of my surroundings
  • Very interesting material. I came in a little late. Wish I could have heard the entire message
  • A reminder of our times!
  • The threat is real - it is there! Coordinaion - organization of info is critical
  • Real facts for an audience that doesn't know much
  • Instant communication/one-time events/trending
  • Intersting topic presentation was engaging & audience appropriate
  • Very beneficial. You should bring them back net year
  • In depth details of terrorist use of technology and state/local means to combat them
  • Eye opening, shows how out fields are impacted
  • The showing of actual videos & information directly from radical groups
  • How to be aware and what to do to help. Flow of critical information
  • Every department in state government should see this presentation
  • Well versed on topic - emphasis on vigilance
  • A real eye opener
  • Good mix of examples
  • Scare tactics, useful for ??
  • Interesting topic, Great speakers

Not Answered: 5

 


Question:
Comments on the weak points of sessions:

  • None - good speaker(s)
  • There were none - I truly enjoyed this entire presentation
  • Could have been more interactive towards skills or audience, to pull more involvement
  • None
  • Some sort of demo would be nice
  • Would've liked more info on how it applies to audience - what we can do to protect our _____.
  • No presentation handouts (for future reference)
  • Would like more that I could have to take back with me
  • Not evenly focus on terrorists attack easy technology. Was only briefly discussed
  • None
  • Should be a one day session or longer
  • Acronymns - too many wierd names that I will never remember
  • None

Not Answered: 13


Question:
Were the objectives defined?
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Yes 95.5% 80.8%
No 4.5% 3.8%
Not Answered N/A 15.4%
Total 100% 100%
 

 

Question:
Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared?
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Yes 23 88.5%
No 0 0.0%
Not Answered 3 11.5%
Total 26 100%
 

 

 

Question:
Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials?
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Yes 23 88.5%
No 0 0.0%
Not Answered 3 11.5%
Total 26 100%
 
Question:
Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective?
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Yes 23 88.5%
No 0 0.0%
Not Answered 3 11.5%
Total 26 100%
 
Question:
Were course objectives met?
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Yes 21 80.8%
No 1 3.8%
Not Answered 4 15.4%
Total 26 100%
 
Question:
Was the use of visual aids effective?
 
  Count % Sample
Total
Yes 23 88.5%
No 0 0.0%
Not Answered 3 11.5%
Total 26 100%
 

Question:
How could these sessions be improved?

  • With regards to IT, may find a way to focus information technology
  • I would like an actual 5-day class with booklet/handouts
  • More breaks, realte to IT more

Not Answered: 23