Unified Communications -
Wed 10/01/2008
Not Answered: 0
|
|
Question: |
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Excellent |
23 |
74.2% |
| Good |
6 |
19.4% |
| Fair |
0 |
0.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
6.5% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
Comments on the strong points of sessions: |
|
|
- Excellent communications skills. Good visuals
- Demo very good. Very knowledgeable
- Very good communications
- Great session
- Quality demos, good speaker, easy to understand (products)
- Good demo w/ offsite Ms. Statt
- Great demos
- I really liked the fact that this session was interactive, not just a powerpoint - nice to seee the technology work
- All
- Demo of video & voice activated exchange
- Collaboration with co-workers out of state
- Excellent demonstrations
- Very interesting presentation - learned a lot. It would be great if our company was able to do UC
- Details of features - demos
- Great Session
- Very interesting and lively
- Nice presentation about "Live Management". I have used it before and like it for collaboration on small projects
- Demos & correctional tone
- Excellent demonstrations of capabilities. Good introduction of variety/humor
- Very knowledgeable presentation
Not Answered: 11 |
Question: |
Comments on the weak points of sessions: |
|
|
- None
- Nothing
- N/A
- No weak points - Allen was great!
- None
- Nothing specific
- Sound/volume
- Loved it
Not Answered: 23 |
|
Question: |
Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
29 |
93.5% |
| No |
1 |
3.2% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
3.2% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
31 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
31 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
31 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
29 |
93.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
6.5% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
30 |
96.8% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
3.2% |
| Total |
31 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
|
- N/A
- Relationship to Cisco VOIP/ROM BB&BE
- Nothing
- Mobile specular & microphone system
Not Answered: 27 |
|
|