The Trust Factor - Thur. 10/02/2008
Not Answered: 0
|
|
Question: |
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Excellent |
17 |
100.0% |
| Good |
0 |
0.0% |
| Fair |
0 |
0.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
Comments on the strong points of sessions: |
|
|
- Great presenter. I got so much out of this 1 hour I could swear it was 3! I left with good concepts and methods for building trust. Best session so far!
- Good interactive session
- Fun & relevant. Loved the mouse trap exercise :o)
- Low trust = elevation of slowness to get things down
- Michelle did a great job delivering this class! I wa very impressed with the way she cought the attention of the participants and kept our attention
- Excellent presenter, very upbeat & used real world examples when making points
- Lots of good info
- Perfect & fun
- Knowledge of information
- Interactive, activity (mousetrap). Thank You!
Not Answered: 7 |
Question: |
Comments on the weak points of sessions: |
|
|
- None
- None
- Could have stayed for more
- None
- Continuum explanation...
Not Answered: 12 |
|
Question: |
Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
17 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
17 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
17 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
17 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
17 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
17 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
17 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
|
- Could have been 1.5 hr.
- More time
Not Answered: 15 |
|
|