Keynote Speaker: Doug Robinson -
NASCIO - Thur. 10/02/2008
Not Answered: 0
|
|
Question: |
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Excellent |
18 |
60.0% |
| Good |
11 |
36.7% |
| Fair |
0 |
0.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
3.3% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
Comments on the strong points of sessions: |
|
|
- Good overview
- Excellent insight into states responses and overall outlook on IT strategies and focuses.
- Survey pieces were excellent
- Results of surveys
- Liked the survey data!
- Very informative!
- Mr. Robinson had a wide ranging understanding of the IT business.
- Excellent presentation sharing of multi state level trends
- Good overall view of national strategies
- Good overview of what other states doing/concerns
- Wide coverage
- Good information on overall state ITO stategies
- Loved the straw polls for the previous meeting in Milwaukee
- Great overview of national & state IT landscape
- Broad view; survey info
- Lots of info
- Very interesting date trends
- Great information!
Not Answered: 12 |
Question: |
Comments on the weak points of sessions: |
|
|
- Too long
- Latter half was rushed
- Second part was just a recital of names
- Need more relevant infor about the future plands for employees - more details
- Set us dual screens in roon so all can see slides
- Lots of information to process
- Power point slides were great (NOT "in death by PPT" all all)
- The highlight colors, once applied, made it difficult to see the underlying text
- Not enough chairs in roon - room too small, couldn't see the screen
Not Answered: 21 |
|
Question: |
Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
24 |
80.0% |
| No |
1 |
3.3% |
| Not Answered |
5 |
16.7% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
28 |
93.3% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
6.7% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
28 |
93.3% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
6.7% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
26 |
86.7% |
| No |
1 |
3.3% |
| Not Answered |
3 |
10.0% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
24 |
80.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
6 |
20.0% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
|
Question: |
Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
| |
Count |
% Sample
Total |
| Yes |
22 |
73.3% |
| No |
3 |
10.0% |
| Not Answered |
5 |
16.7% |
| Total |
30 |
100% |
|
|
| Question: |
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
|
- Compress the survey results presentation
- Less "bullets"
- Couldn't read text when precentages were displayed
- The slides were boring and for IT pros should be a little more graphic.
- Let know if materials are available online afterwards
- Had to see screen from the sides
Not Answered: 24 |
|
|