|
Colorado Fiscal Managers’ Association/Colorado Information Management Association/
Colorado State Managers’ Association
Spring Educational Seminar – May 17-19, 2006
Investing in Our Future:
People, Programs & Performance
|
NCAA Compliance Requirements - Higher Education Track |
Presenter: Jean Stewart |
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Excellent |
13 |
68.4% |
| Good |
6 |
31.6% |
| Fair |
0 |
0.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
17 |
89.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
10.5% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
17 |
89.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
10.5% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
17 |
89.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
10.5% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
17 |
89.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
10.5% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
17 |
89.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
10.5% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentagel |
| Yes |
17 |
89.5% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
2 |
10.5% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
19 |
100% |
|
|
Comments on strong points of sessions |
|
-
concret review
-
discussion with school
-
great presentation very useful
-
relevant points
-
thank you for doing this
-
very good, thorough, consise info
-
just what i needed
-
interaction with aduience
-
great background info, good group dicussion
-
the handouts were really helpful great to see how thingstied out
-
specifices cited in report already prepared
-
Practice points were good
Not Answered: 7
|
Comments on the weak points of sessions |
|
- room
- speak louder
- Structure seemed lacking
Not Answered: 16
|
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
Not Answered: 19
|
