|
Colorado Information Management Association/
Fall Educational Seminar - Nov. 29 - Dec.
1, 2006
IT Diversity: Juggling Many Hats
|
Keynote Speaker: Evolving
Role of Government Tech - Thur. 11/30/2006
|
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please
select one):
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Excellent |
28
|
68.3%
|
| Good |
11
|
26.8%
|
| Fair |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Poor |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
34
|
82.9%
|
| No |
6
|
14.6%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized
& prepared?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
39
|
95.1%
|
| No |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s)
knowledgeable about materials?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
40
|
97.6%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation
style effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
38
|
92.7%
|
| No |
2
|
4.9%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were course objectives met?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
34
|
82.9%
|
| No |
4
|
9.8%
|
| Not Answered |
3
|
7.3%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids
effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
39
|
95.1%
|
| No |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
2.4%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
41
|
100%
|
|
|
Comments on strong points of
sessions | |
- great overview of needs to be met during crisis
- very informative
- interesting
- very interesting
- great coverage of different areas of IT
- Great knowledge
- a lot of experiential information
- Great Stories, good energy of the speaker, good knowledge
of something for everyone.
- very thorough - fact and data based - entertaining
- Interesting points for emergency management
- Good emergency points
- emergency prep
- Great to relate "real life stories" to how we
can prepare for emergencies and better management IT in
gov't.
- He knew what we were working through and gave good case
studies that acknowledged our government's unique challenges.
- Interesting discussion on dr
- Excellent speaker
- very good points on operational continuance
- I liked the real world examples and also some disaster
issues that you don't normally think of from the IT
perspective.
- One can forget the role that IT plays in emergency response.
- It was quite revealing. The degree of effected systems
was fascinating.
- Provoked new thought on the expansion of IT infrastructure
in today's environment.
- broad, deep and meaningful
- good info and exposure to business analysis.
- 311 system and it's use
- Great shared experiences
- Great and interesting speaker with alot of information.
- Importance of 311; elements of emergency support within
the government.
- interesting info
- interesting info
- expanded my mind on what will effect us during an emergency.
- Good examples of the spread of technology's reach
in the government. Especially at the municipal level; Very
effective and sincere speaking style.
- Good 10,000 foot view, good speaker
- Lots of diverse information - interesting projects
- Good job of covering a large amount of material and subjects
in a short amount of time.
Not Answered: 7
|
Comments on the weak points of
sessions | |
- could've been longer
- Loved it all
- No real weak points
- too long with too much detail
- A bit lengthy, didn't really address how changing
views of technology affected legislation, security,
etc.
- none
- n/a
- Would have loved to have more time.
- Relate presentation to audience = State of Colorado
- none
- A few more photos please.
- slides were too light. Dense and compressed
- none
- needed more time
- Too much too cover in the time frame provided.
- Loaded slides- too much information at times.
- Rushed in spots; emphasize how the examples and lessons
apply to state and local government - No coverage of
political strategy to get a level table.
- Everything was from the state perspective, nothing
from the agency perspective. Poor time management.
- Did not clearly state purpose of talk - What was he
going to talk about? What's the point?
- none
Not Answered: 2
|
How could these sessions be improved?
| |
- Larger screen for visual presentation
- Excellent
- none- very interesting
- I would like to know more about how procurement, etc.
can be sped up to allow faster change management.
- Lighting on speaker & main stage in main meeting
room was too dark or needed some spotlighting on speaker
- n/a
- not sure
- This could be a 2-3 day session with a state IT leader
- light on speaker, larger display
- give him more time to speak and more questions
- fix weak points
- Chairs were too close together
Not Answered: 28
|
| |
|