Colorado Information Management Association/

Fall Educational Seminar - Nov. 29 - Dec. 1, 2006

IT Diversity: Juggling Many Hats

Introduction Session: PM Common Methodology v1.0 - Thur. 11/30/2006
Presenter: Kim Heldman
Overall quality of the session (please select one):
 
Count
Percentage
Excellent
12
48.0%
Good
13
52.0%
Fair
0
0.0%
Poor
0
0.0%
Not Answered
0
0.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%
Effectiveness of presentation:
Topic: Were the objectives defined?
 
Count
Percentage
Yes
24
96.0%
No
0
0.0%
Not Answered
1
4.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%
Effectiveness of presentation:
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared?




 
Count
Percentage
Yes
24
96.0%
No
0
0.0%
Not Answered
1
4.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%
Effectiveness of presentation:
Topic: Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials?
 
Count
Percentage
Yes
24
96.0%
No
0
0.0%
Not Answered
1
4.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%









Effectiveness of presentation:
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective?

 
Count
Percentage
Yes
24
96.0%
No
0
0.0%
Not Answered
1
4.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%
Effectiveness of presentation:
Topic: Were course objectives met?
 
Count
Percentage
Yes
24
96.0%
No
0
0.0%
Not Answered
1
4.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%
Effectiveness of presentation:
Topic: Was the use of visual aids effective?
 
Count
Percentage
Yes
24
96.0%
No
0
0.0%
Not Answered
1
4.0%
Not Asked
0
0.0%
Total
25
100%
   
Open Ended Answers
 
Comments on strong points of sessions
  • juggling act
  • Great that they tied into the "juggling hats"
  • Active and interesting. Juggling!
  • Very specific in covering all major tasks involved in PM
  • Very creative in presenting their objectives
  • audience participation and enthusiastic speakers
  • Interactive
  • very enthusiastic
  • Interaction with group and engaging group into presentation.
  • very interactive - great
  • great overview
  • Very entertaining and insightful. Great way to relay info
  • very entertaining...great use of props
  • Excellent information and message; very clear objectives and detail to meet it.
  • Strategic planning
  • Kept it light but informative
  • Very well with interacting
  • Good introduction class

Not Answered: 7
Comments on the weak points of sessions

  • Need to develop how PM can be integrated with other areas and methodologies; like business analysis
  • Need to develop how PM can be integrated with other areas and methodologies; like business analysis
  • Could be longer for more questions.
  • none
  • Elaine's interjections began to make the session disjointed about 30 minutes into comments. Could have been structured in better.
  • provide more detail - but understandable because of the time frame.

Not Answered: 19
How could these sessions be improved?

  • well presented
  • Handout slides for audience to take notes on, prior to the end of the session.
  • see # 3
  • see # 3
  • Maybe a role play instead of juggling act. use more state examples
  • more time for session.
  • handouts

Not Answered: 18