|
Colorado Information Management Association/
Fall Educational Seminar - Nov. 29 - Dec.
1, 2006
IT Diversity: Juggling Many Hats
|
Incident Response -
Forensics - Wed. 11/29/2006
|
|
Presenter: Michael Staggs
|
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please
select one):
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Excellent |
14
|
70.0%
|
| Good |
6
|
30.0%
|
| Fair |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Poor |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
18
|
90.0%
|
| No |
1
|
5.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
5.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized
& prepared?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
18
|
90.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
2
|
10.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s)
knowledgeable about materials?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
20
|
100.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation
style effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
18
|
90.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
2
|
10.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were course objectives met?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
19
|
95.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
5.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids
effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
19
|
95.0%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
5.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
20
|
100%
|
|
|
Comments on strong points of
sessions | |
- outstanding content and presentation
- very good speaker
- Knowledgeable speaker, lively. Good info
- Lots of info
- Network security enlightenment
- Very knowledgeable - humorous - not afraid to speak from
his heart
- very interactive presentation, kept the interest piqued
- Good Message
- Passionate; Couple of good references; good framing of
issues in a legal context; seems like a good resource.
- Entertaining
- Strong speaker, good info and points
- Dynamic speaker, excellent points, well organized.
- Very impressive and entertaining speaker. Very interesting
content.
- Very effective speaker. Seemed honestly enthusiastic about
the subject.
Not Answered: 6
|
Comments on the weak points of
sessions | |
- none
- not long enough
- "Preachy" No exercises; No handouts; Lots
of buzzwords thrown around for impact.
- Likes shock value in comments too much; Ego sometimes
overcomes message; (but he seems OK with this)
- I wish we could've done more network forensics.
- none
Not Answered: 14
|
How could these sessions be improved?
| |
- This one should've been longer
- (additional comment) Pretty good for an earth dwelling
invertebrate that talks like George Carlin
- see weak points
- live examples of security issues and fixes.
- more more more
- Focus on State, not non-state.
Not Answered: 14
|
| |
|
