|
Colorado Fiscal Managers’ Association/Colorado Information Management Association/
Colorado State Managers’ Association
Spring Educational Seminar – May 17-19, 2006
Investing in Our Future:
People, Programs & Performance
|
Getting Things Done Whether You're In Charge or Not |
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please select one): |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Excellent |
23 |
60.5% |
| Good |
15 |
39.5% |
| Fair |
0 |
0.0% |
| Poor |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
37 |
97.4% |
| No |
1 |
2.6% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized & prepared? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
38 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) knowledgeable about materials? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
38 |
100.0% |
| No |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation style effective? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
37 |
97.4% |
| No |
1 |
2.6% |
| Not Answered |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Were course objectives met? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentage |
| Yes |
36 |
94.7% |
| No |
1 |
2.6% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
2.6% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation: |
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids effective? |
|
| |
Count |
Percentagel |
| Yes |
36 |
94.7% |
| No |
1 |
2.6% |
| Not Answered |
1 |
2.6% |
| Not Asked |
0 |
0.0% |
| Total |
38 |
100% |
|
|
Comments on strong points of sessions |
|
-
very full of energy
-
I like the lists of questions for employees, managers and peers
-
speaker volume was good
-
lively good presenter
-
great speaker, good tips
-
great speaker, good tips
-
vibrant, energetic
-
goo presentation skills leadership vs pushing
-
very upbeat presenter
-
good presenter
-
energy good interaction w/ group
-
great topic overview with some fresh ideas for improvement
-
very positive, energetic
-
bad seed, bad seed, made it fun to learn, presenter is excited about topic
-
entertaining
-
excellent presentation
-
good humor to illustrate points
-
presenter has great energy, good use of humor, great info to use in all aspects of life
-
very interactive
-
good ideas
-
great examples, handouts very effective
-
handouts - questions
-
good communicator
Not Answered: 15
|
Comments on the weak points of sessions |
|
- should use powerpoint instead of word
- seemed a little shallow of material
- not sure it will help me get more done
- reduce number of rehetorical questions
- use page down instead of scrolling
- not long enough
- not long enough, more in handouts
Not Answered: 31
|
How could these sessions be improved? |
|
- provide more handouts/slides referred
- provide handouts of materials covered
- well presented topic
- well presented topic
Not Answered: 34
|