|
Colorado Information Management Association/
Fall Educational Seminar - Nov. 29 - Dec.
1, 2006
IT Diversity: Juggling Many Hats
|
Creating a BA Center
for excellence: 5 Ways to Get There - Wed. 11/29/2006
|
|
|
Overall quality of the session (please
select one):
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Excellent |
14
|
73.7%
|
| Good |
5
|
26.3%
|
| Fair |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Poor |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were the objectives defined?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
15
|
78.9%
|
| No |
2
|
10.5%
|
| Not Answered |
2
|
10.5%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) organized
& prepared?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
18
|
94.7%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
5.3%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s)
knowledgeable about materials?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
18
|
94.7%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
5.3%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the presenter(s) presentation
style effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
17
|
89.5%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
2
|
10.5%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Were course objectives met?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
15
|
78.9%
|
| No |
1
|
5.3%
|
| Not Answered |
3
|
15.8%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Effectiveness of presentation:
|
|
Topic: Was the use of visual aids
effective?
| |
| |
Count
|
Percentage
|
| Yes |
18
|
94.7%
|
| No |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Not Answered |
1
|
5.3%
|
| Not Asked |
0
|
0.0%
|
| Total |
19
|
100%
|
|
|
Comments on strong points of
sessions | |
- lots of good information, presented well.
- Great information and expertise in a relatively unmatured
discipline(BA)
- tight logic, nothing loose
- keypoints strongly made and repeated.
- excellent info
- great overview of process
- Made some interesting points
- starting off, i was confused not fully understanding BA.
But left with great ideas on how to implement changes towards
a solid BA system.
- Energy
- well presented
- good personality
Not Answered: 8
|
Comments on the weak points of
sessions | |
- too fast
- no handout
- RUSHED
- Needed handout for reference
- some unexplained acronyms
- speed was a bit much.
- not what some expected
- fast, compression of info presented.
- n/a
- Needed a handout
- none
Not Answered: 8
|
How could these sessions be improved?
| |
- Handout with space to write notes
- Larger font size
- handout
- handout
- (additional comment) Geese "honk" not "quack".
Even Canadian geese.
- more time on topic detail
Not Answered: 13
|
| |
|
